GAS LIGHTING, MIND CONTROL & BRAINWASHING

​​

​​

How similar are lgbt groups to those who use gas lighting, Brainwashing & mind control?​

​​

Strawman/gaslighting: Not only are children impacted by this form of persuasion within the group, but people out are also impacted by the dark art of mind control in the form of gaslighting.
Look at the wording used by the group on outsiders...
You hate us is a strawman argument meant to shut arguments down against whatever they want to do.
Knowing that you can love someone and not always agree is essential.
My question is not how do adults understand how to use the art of misdirection and strawman arguments; how do kids? How would they know unless someone taught them?
Another question is how do you figure that if someone does not agree, they hate you? It does not stand to reason. How are people making the connection?

 

​​​

​​​

Important Truth- Gaslighting, what is it?

How does it work

You can't question us.

Change the subject... "You hate us?" How did we get from your behavior concerning your hating us?

My Story of Gaslighting: I know what it is to be misled, gaslighted, and brainwashed for over 30 years by an older, more mature person. To see the danger that misleading information causes personally and in families. I know what it is not to see or want to see family members based on lies, half-truths, and information my young developing mind could not handle. I know what it is to be an actor or pawn in someone else's dream. And I know what it is to wake up from that dream of mis and inappropriate information and have to fix things I was led to destroy by someone else. I did not know my father or his family for 28 years because of the brainwashing of my mother from childhood, starting earlier than elementary school. It's called parental alienation. It's a form of brainwashing, conditioning of a human to respond in a certain way, specifically negative towards family members, [my definition]. It's meant to be an attack on the other parent by turning their child against them. However, the parent who employs this cares very little about what happens to the child. Everyone is harmed by the fallout, which is sometimes years later.

​

It's also classified as a form of abuse. It takes place upon children and warps and destroys relationships. Sometimes, parents do it intentionally; other times, it is not deliberate with careless or inflammatory words or ideas like seeds. They start small and grow to something hard to deal with the long it continues. When it starts early, it may affect a child into adulthood or entire life.

​

Today, 28 years later, I woke up; I broke the programming that imprisoned me. And I'm reconciling with my father and his family and fixing what was broken. 

​

I'm facing the problems I did not create, ones someone older and more mature who should have been leading me rightly created. But will my mother take the blame for the damage she did for over 30? 

​

Lgbt encourages kids to modify their bodies, and I think they promote separation from family who love them. But years from now, when these children are older and wake up, what will they have? Who will be there? Who will take responsibility for what they did as minors based on the misleading information from someone older and more mature? In the case of surgery and sex reassignment, they can never go back.

​​

Whoever decided to bring lgbt teaching into classrooms is planting seeds. As I showed, when seeds are planted early on, they may take root and are not easy to remove years down the line, and by that time, there may be a lot of unwanted results and consequences that can't be revoked.

​

No one in the Lgbt community is going to step up and take responsibility for what you did to your body as a child years ago based on the information, lack of information, or misinformation they gave you years early.

Who can you complain to if you don't like what you've done to yourself years down the road?

Who will fix it? Can it be fixed? Who would you sue?

If you exiled yourself from your family, they may not be there 5, 10, or 20 years later. They may move, they may fall out of contact, they might even die... Die waiting for you to wake up.

​​​

I'm Blessed 28 years later, I was able to reconcile. But that is not promised to everyone.

​​

Gaslighting is brainwashing and abuse; it hurts everyone!

​​​​

​​​

Biblical Context- Did you know JESUS confronted people and had debates?

JESUS often spoke with people who had differing opinions. Sometimes, they heard HIS words, but most times, they did not. But JESUS always keeps the door of conversation open to better HIS hearers and those around HIM.

Many times, within lgbt communities and trans groups as well as individuals, the door of freedom of speech is closed. People who have differing ideas attempt to reach out to them. What many in the trans and lgbt community don't realize is that they are painting themselves in a corner. Walling themselves inside a fortress with no supplies and dwindling resources. The term Safe Space is used to protect people from quote "Judgement." But people make judgments every day. Those in the lgbt community make judgments. What are judgments? A decision... that's it! We all make decisions about people. We must do. The Safe spaces seem reserved where no one can speak truthfully in opposition to someone else. The lgbt community and any community can become cult-like by keeping opposing ideas, thoughts, and words from reaching their members.

Fear of contaminated its members. Questioning people is not wrong, especially concerning matters of great importance. We should have the right to ask any group or individual, especially those who work with children and affect the lives of everyone. For example, if a person would like to be a trans male or female, why is it that people who are not trans have to have the prefix "Cis" in front of their pronoun? I can not tell someone else what they should call themselves; why should they tell me what I am? This is now affecting me and others. I'm happy being a Man; no prefix is needed.

But the problem is, if I question it, I may hear something like I'm homophobic or something of that nature. When, in truth, I don't want to be involved.

My concern broadens now that children are forced to learn this in schools with or without parental consent. To say we can not pose respectfully placed questions is like eating food and being unable to ask what's in it. It seems dangerous and ridiculous. Cults usually never tell people everything upfront. Instead, people gradually learn more about the group and on a need-to-know basis.

Suppose children don't have gender dysphoria and receive medicine, hormones, and surgery. In that case, children may be being brainwashed, and every parent must ask what the result of their child learning about gender diversity is. Where is all this going? Where are you taking my child?

For a visual of the end results of trans, gender diversity, theory, and lgbt teachings, scroll to the last section, read the cautionary note in yellow, and follow the instructions.

Be warned that the images are graphic and not for children and others

 who may find it disturbing.

​

If they are gaslighting children, why?

There is much concern that children are being brainwashed in the classrooms and online against their parent's will or knowledge. The idea is that someone is dropping breadcrumbs and leading children to believe something that is not so about themselves and their parents, the people who birth and love them. It seems like a well-thought-out plan that lgbt ideas are introduced in school, on kid shows, and in places where children visit. If a person was subtly influencing children or the lgbt community was influencing, wouldn't it seem very likely that they would use these tactics to recruit? If they are not, there will be many coincidences. For instance, they deal with children open to learning and being molded. The information they learn now may follow them for a lifetime. If you were going to brainwash people to your views, you'd have more tremendous success with children. They are not recruiting adults in droves, its\'s children that are claiming to be trans or gay in large numbers. Why aren't adults having this great awakening in large numbers?

That leads me to believe that children's sexuality is not been suppressed; they are being converted.

Strangely enough,  they can say yes, but they can't say no... What I mean is that in some states, it is illegal to try to convince a child that they are not gay or trans, and you can not take them to get counsel against it. The children can get 8 hours of lgbt information in school and be fed more on social media, but it's illegal to see a professional who says they are the gender they were born (in some states).

​

If a group were recruiting/converting, it would be easier for children than adults. They would use some form of the bait they like—tiny children, like bright colors. Children and people who are developmentally delayed are quickly drawn to bright colors. That's how cartoons and breakfast cereals work. The colors attract them. With this in mind, who uses a rainbow as their symbol? Using it in classrooms and in front of small children would make sense because they like it. We should not associate bright colors with gay or trans; just because children like bright colors does not make them trans. These are just a few ways a person, an organization, or a movement might convert people to their way of thinking.

​​​​​​

Critical Thought- BIID, what is it?

BIID, also known as "Body Integrity Identity Disorder," " Body Integrity Dysphoria," known as "Xenomelia," and also known as "Amputee Identity Disorder," is a condition where a person does not believe that part of their body belongs to them, usually an arm or a leg, but sometimes eyes. This belief leads them to seek the limb or eye to be removed. Some with the condition desire to be handicapped and view it as something desirable or glorious.

This Body Integrity Dysphoria is said to be associated with Gender Dysphoria for two main reasons.

They are similar in that both are believed to come from how the mind views the body, creating a mental image versus the actual physical body. In Gender Dysphoria, the mind makes an image of the body, but as a different gender than in reality; that's where the schism comes in. The mental image of self is different than the one seen by the person and causes sadness, pain, anxiety, and so on. Similar to Body Integrity Dysphoria, also called BIID, where the person truly believes the mental image of the mind is correct, and the actual body is in error. In this image, instead of sex or gender being different, limbs are missing, an eye may be missing, or they are deaf. People with Gender Dysphoria are often referred to as Transgender, and people with Body Integrity Dysphoria sometimes refer to themselves as Transabled.

People with BIID sometimes feel that a particular part of their body does not belong to them, that it is foreign or alien, similar to how transgender people sometimes claim that their breasts or penis do not belong to them or should not be part of their body.

​​

Secondly, they are somewhat connected by the fact that some medical professionals claim that if a person is positive for BIID, they should also be tested for Gender Dysphoria. And vice versa, if a person shows signs of Gender Dysphoria, test for BIID.

​

Some people with BIID or Body Integrity Dysphoria will put on prosthetics and pretend to be disabled to satisfy their desire, similar to how a cross-dresser may put on hair, makeup, and clothes of the opposite sex.

Interestingly, on an episode of Jerry Springer titled, "I'm Happy I Cut Off My Legs!", a man who claims to be a transexual, who was on the show, was also a self-amputee, having removed both of his legs himself, because he felt he did not need it anymore. He had made several attempts years earlier.

This is Not a diagnosis- It may be that this man was exhibiting both Gender Dysphoria and Body Integrity Dysphoria at the same time.

​

One of the reasons for Body Integrity Dysphoria is the part of the brain that is believed to be working improperly or damaged due to childhood trauma or underdevelopment of that area.

Also important to know is that both Body Integrity Dysphoria and Gender Dysphoria have been associated with Autism. Some also say that where either one is, check for Autism.

The BIID, or Body Integrity Dysphoria, is an actual condition, and treatment includes therapy and medication. And lastly, surgery to make a person their desired disability... 

​​

Many Doctors are not so quick to do operations to remove limbs or permanently disable someone as they are with gender reassignment surgery. It is easier to find a doctor or clinic that will do gender reassignment than to find a surgeon who would do a disabling procedure on a person requesting it.

Because of this, many suffering from this condition feel it is unfair and even seem angered at the fact that people with Gender Dysphoria can walk into a doctor's office and have gender surgery done. They have to go through tests to prove that amp they want to be an amputee and be made into a disabled person or physically challenged person.

Considering both groups, why should people with Body Integrity Dysphoria be forced to work hard to prove they should be Trans-abled when the other group does not have to work as hard to become trans-gender Individuals?

Is their argument valid?

Is BIID a choice, or are they born that way?

Should we accept them the way they are and help them become what they feel is right?

Don't people with BIID know what's best for themselves?

If we hinder people with BIID from getting surgery to remove limbs and eyes, shouldn't we also impede those who want to be Transgender, to be fair?

Are both trans-genderism and trans-ableism (BIID) valid things that someone should pursue?

If it becomes a person's life mission to remove their gentiles, why not remove limbs?

Will BIID amputations even be considered medical care, and will doctors be forced to do procedures at patients' request?

Will children be able to get BIID amputations without parental consent or involvement, similar to gender reassignment, drugs, and surgery? Can they go to school one day and come home with a limb missing?

Will there be Body Integrity Dysphoria training in schools and "Trans-abled person Story hour" at libraries? Who knows?

Will there be cartoons and books marketed to Children?

Would the LGBT ever accept people who electively remove healthy working limbs and transition from healthy bodies that work to disabled bodies into their community?

Can the rainbow extend to this group of people?

If their brain tells them there is a schism between mental image and actuality, which is correct?

 

​​​​

Critical Thought- What  are MAP's or NO-MAP's

While the majority of lgbt groups claim not to support pedophilia and NOMAPs (Non-Offending Minor Attracted Persons), also called maps, some are attracted to minors within the community. This is evident in the much-needed group called "Gays against Groomers" that exists. The concern was not a possibility, problem, or issue that people from within their community could foresee; they would not need it.

In the same vein, Congressman Leigh Finke introduced "HF1655," a bill that some say would protect pedophiles in Minnesota, and others, that that's not the case. 

There is also a push to make Minnesota a state for trans youth to come for transition treatment without parental interference.

​

When storms collide...

The introduction of Lgbt teaching in schools and children's programs is said to encourage diversity.

But to be as diverse as it claims, wouldn't all groups have to be included...

The Lgbt flag, with all the colors, represents all sexual orientations and all races. But would that also include those attracted to minors (the MAPs)? How can they contain all but exclude one?

The same moral soil that gave rise to same-sex unions can also allow for minor-attracted persons.

Can the Lgbt exclude MAPs and still be tolerant of all people? Love is love. Are all sexual orientations welcome?

​

Considering we already have drag queens strip shows for children and parades with naked people twerking in front of minors and people getting beat with leather, where do we draw the line, and are we being intolerant and hateful of another group if we make any distinctions at all? MAPs, maybe, the new kids on the block.

​

What child would dream of seeing a naked person dressed as the opposite sex do a seductive dance that would be seen in a gentlemen's club unless an adult introduced the idea to them? We cannot govern the intimate thoughts in people's hearts so long as they don't act on them. But someone may be getting aroused, either the children or the performers. For what purpose would a naked man twerk like a woman in front of a small child at a parade or a birthday party? What is the purpose of adult-themed sexual dances if not to arouse all who are watching and, if not, perhaps the performers themselves? You don't hire an exotic dancer because they can keep beat!

​​

Speaking of parades, please check out this video. Listen to their words.

​​

​​​

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​In New York, during The Pride parade, paradegoers were heard chanting. "We here, We're queer, We're coming for your children!" You can find the video on social media.

​​

Did you hear what they were chanting? After seeing the video, hearing the chants, and looking at what was happening around us, what can we say except that the signs were all there? They told us to our faces what to expect, and we handed our children to them. How many parents would laugh at a joke, "I'm coming to hurt your loved ones."? No thinking parent would make allowances for that to happen. In the improbable chance that they are not joking, do you let your guard down?

​​

The two perfect storms are grooming and legislation.

If there is grooming going on in the Lgbt and trans community, then you have to admit that children are being "primed," ripped like fruit, and fattened like calves for something. In other words, children are being hypersexualized in the classrooms and at these events, even on TV. In the name of education, they are being introduced to sex acts and visuals that are meant to stir sexual feelings in adults, let alone minors. For example, one book that has caused many parents to question what schools are teaching children is "Gender Queer." In the book, there are multiple images of various sex acts, including two men performing oral sex, pictures of the male penis, a blood-stained sanitary pad, unknown vaginal fluid, a vibrator (sex toys), and so on. The education of children on same-sex relations does not have to be explicit or graphic. TruTruthfullyooks like this have the potential to warp people's minds, i.e., pornographic. We've known for years that children should not be exposed to adult material, and the facilitating of the viewing of pornography is a crime. Because their brains are not fully developed, introducing something they are not ready for could harm their natural growth. Pornography has the same effect on an adult brain as a hit of cocaine; what impact would it have on a child? So, it seems that lgbt training and education are not freeing children but enslaving them and confusing them. Possibly scaring them, but we won't know that until 10 or 15 years from now.

​

 When people view pornography images or think of sexual things, they tend to want to have sex. 

The other side of the coin would have to be the legal aspect. If the laws are changed to include/protect pedophilia, the children will be ready. They've already been trained for years. Two perfect storms are heading towards each other.

Ultimately, transitioning from viewing adult-theme shows, movies, and school programs to engaging in them is not a big jump. It's right there!

And there will be nothing that can be done about it.

​

If we have no grounds to stop same-sex attraction, what ground will we have to prevent pedophiles from acting out on their sexual orientation? How soon until they complain, "It's unfair that they are not accepted by the public and are persecuted for their sexual behaviors."?

How soon will they want to have their own school curriculum and diversity training in schools nationwide?

What about pedophile story hour?

Further, suppose have no grounds to stop same-sex relations in minors and prevent them from transitioning. What would we have to prevent minors from being attracted to adults and seeking ties with them? If children can transition without parental authority, why could they choose to have relations with an adult?

Right now the only thing stopping them from fulfilling their desire is the law, my point is if the Lgbt people could fight to change the laws in this nation couldn't pedophiles do the same, using the same methods to achieve their goals. The right people will cry, there's hypocrisy to legitimize their cause.

And once the door is cracked, a flood pours out. Things we have never heard of will be legitimized if the same method the Lgbt used is employed.

​

But this is only a taste of things worse to come. If after same-sex and trans comes pedophilia, behind that may be Beastiality, perhaps? And behind that, Necrophilia?

Beastiality- Animal-attracted persons who engage or wish to engage in sex with animals.

NeocrophilA persons on sexually stimulated by bodies of dead human possibly animals and humans), may engage in sex with them or wish to.

They both are sexual orientations that people have exhibited. If love is love, as often heard, then these people also need to be accepted in their sexuality and even celebrated.

Much more is waiting to come besides what the Lgbt has already introduced to the public.

 

 

 

​
 

Critical Thought- Gay is the new Black.

Some years ago, it was funny and cool to say, "I'm going to beat you like a slave!" We all laughed about it. I have never seen a runaway slave get beat; I imagine neither has the person who said it.

Funny for the moment... But, moments pass. What dishonor did I heap on someone else, or the making light of the people to whom it happened? Think about it. Is it fair to make a joke at the expense of another human being? How about an entire people group? If love is love, why would it be ok to use another person or people's pain to get what you want?

​

Intro

The number of Blacks who died between 1501to 1867 was approx.12.5 million - 13 Million African people were taken against their will, Kidnaped from Africa, and brought by nasty, diseased, rotted, rat and germ-infested wooden vessels to the New World to do forced brutal labor. They would be brutalized, terrorized, beaten, abused, raped, taken from their land, lose their cultural identity, family, and personhood. They would no longer be considered human. They would be mistreated for 400 years... and still are to this day. The sheer number and severity do not match up to the gay experience. While gays have gone through much mistreatment over the years, there are drastic differences. And to compare the two does harm to Black people, lessens the abuse they suffered, or even makes light of it.

Gay people are not the new Black; the statement is an insult and ridicule.

​​​

Would you be so bold as to say, "Gay is the Jewish"? I think it would never get off the ground. The pushback from the Jewish Community, they would never, never have that.

They did not say, "Gay is the new Native American Indian." Why?

They would not say, "Gay is the New Asian."

They would not have it either.

Why choose the Black community?

Black people are generally not as vocal or speak up against things that affect their communities, such as community council, leadership, and neighborhood groups. To give an example, in some inner cities, Black and Latino communities, like Brownsville, Brooklyn East New York, there are children's prison, halfway homes, drug rehab clinics, there are registered sex offenders, multiple former & repeat convicted felons, low-income housing, two recycling facilities, and a recently built adult prison. People tend to dump things in this community and on Black people that they would not do to themselves or their loved ones. Take note of the recycling facilities, which are dumps. People get away with landing or pushing things on Black people, but this dates back to slavery. Due to 400 years of slavery, Black people, in general, have been conditioned not to speak up or unify and affect change. It seems that many in inner-city neighborhoods are not trying to impact their area positively; they are just trying to live there. Instead, they learned to deal with it, not change it. Many would not light candles; instead of cursing the dark, many do not fight politically. There is a wave of change, but it's slow. Black people in urban areas may not contact their elected officials or members of Congress.

​​

However, a few train rides away, in Tribeca Manhattan, the people, and the community would never stand for all these things mentioned above; they would come together and protest and put pressure on their elected officials and community leaders until change happened.

So, why choose Black people to relate to, they usually don't speakout or speakup, unify or have interest in political power, (Usually). People dump on us and have been using Black people to get their way for years; that is the go-to default of many people. Also, the abuse black people have suffered & are suffering brings credibility when referenced. For example, if I said, "He hit that guy like Mike Tyson", people understand and build a picture in their mind of what it was when the the person hit him. We all know Mike Tyson hits extremely hard.

Similarly, we know slavery is wrong, and the abuse was horrific. So, if I said, "He beat him like a runaway slave." There would be no mistaking what this person is referring to. That the level of abuse the person endured is bestial, equal to a crime against humanity.

In the minds of people just about everywhere... they associate the Black experience with abuse, rape, torture, slavery, kidnapping, and even low-level living and poverty.

​

So, in saying Gay is the new Black... whoever made that exertion is not referencing Black people as athletes, fashion setters, trend makers, dynamic musicians and dancers, stellar achievers, and inventors in breakthroughs in science that change the world and aid humankind. That's not what they are referring to! The framework they want you to envision is ungodly abuse, harsh treatment, and dehumanizing of an entire group. The speaker wants to claim the mantle/title that Black people carry (one obtained through the deaths of many known and unknown Africans who never made it to the New World and those who died here). The problem is that someone who never experienced what another went through wants to show up and claim the same reward or benefits as those who have experienced slavery and its aftereffects.

Is it fair to say we are like the Black people about slavery, not the good aspects?

Why is this important to write? Sadly, there is an undeniable push to equate Black with Gay. And the two are not the same... we harm the people and dishonor those of the past. 

​​They would use no other race as a cover and give validity to their desires... 

​​But Black people, in general, are getting more politically minded. But many fail to see the lifting up of their Black people as a temporary move to boast Gay rights.

These are just a few reasons why Gay is Not the new Black... and should not be used synonymously with Black or African. There are others.

​​

1) Treated less than humans even After Slavery, Generational effects on Children today.

But to the eyes of many, Black people remain the perfect example of what abused & treated people look like in America and the world. After slavery, they let the people go... into what? They became wanderers. They were unlearned, lacked fine skills, could not read, and other social and behavioral skills were also absent. This meant that they could not live in American society on their own. Sadly, they would turn to things that are destructive to survive, criminal and indecent acts. And ways that were demeaning, similar to what they did to survive slavery. What did enslavers think would happen when they turned the people loose with no money, skill, formal training, and only the clothes they wore? They they expect them t get jobs? These are people who had physical and emotional wounds that had not been healed. They have been abused and psychologically tortured and broken, and they were just turned loose in a field one day, left to wander. The master just said you're free. While some went back to their former master and took jobs that paid, there was hardly any difference to slavery.

​

There are books written on how to break enslaved people and psychologically control them by White masters. (There have never been a people like the Africans brought to be enslaved.)  Most would return to work for their former masters and ask for employment in exchange for room and food. Or, sharecropping. Did slavery end? Of all the people groups these wrongs have never been atoned for, Black people in American pretty much have been left to fend for themselves. Gay and homosexual people have never experienced that as a whole.

What was done to enslaved Africans was so disturbing and wicked that it affected them & children years after slavery. For multiple generations, even their children feel the impact of what happened 159 years ago. That's 400 years of psychological torture and mental illness because not all of them were well afterward. And the 159 years of continued of slavery subtle slavery. Because Black people had to do some dishonest, lowly, and devious things to survive, it stayed ingrained in the hearts of many of their dependents today. Hence, why urban communities looked upon as the hood or being rundown, it's the mentality the people adopted in oslavery survive slavery, that the hidden implication behind the word, "ghetto". (Nothat te that not every Black person has still been affected.)d).

​

2) Never Compensated

Still, despite all of this, Black people in America and other countries have never, never received compensation after slavery. In America, we were to receive 3 acres and a mule per enslaved person for the 400 years of harsh treatment and injustice promised by President Lincoln. But virtually every other racial group has been compensated in America and the world: the Jews, the Native Americans, and the Asians (Chinese after they were falsely incarcerated during WW2). Why not the Black descendants of the slaves, whose blood built this country

​​

3) Lost of Identity

Black people still receive some measure of discrimination and have 400+ years of wrong thinking that was bred into them that need to be healed. Also, there was the identity; African slaves did not know who they were. In some sense, we still don't. Ripped from their country, taken from their loved ones into slavery, families torn apart... A brother goes to the West Indies, and a sister goes to America (Virginia, the Carolinas), never to see each other again, lost of culture, language, and name.

Blacks in America are not Africans. We are related by blood, but we can never return to Africa and call it home like nothing happened. To add to the situation many Black people deal with today, many of us are mixed with indigenous people of the Americas and Europeans. While we tend to look like our own African Ancestors, we are not Africans anymore. Africans were the people who were brought here. After several generations of forced breeding and selective breeding and intermingling with the people around us and the fact that slave records were not always kept, we may only be able to go back generations in our family. 

If you take a tiger from the wild, that tiger is yours for life... They can never go back to the wild...

They act differently, think differently, are socially different, and even smell like humans.

We can't transplant African Americans or insert them back in Africa. Over time, through generating, we are not the same people who came on the boats.

​

4) Race cannot change and can't be hidden in most cases.

I can never hide my African traits: hair, eyes, nose, lips, or skin.

You know what "race" I am by glancing.

As for homosexual, gay, or anything else, no one knows unless you show them.

If you go to any cemetery and examine any person's remains, just by looking, ing you can't tell what religion they are, what their favorite song was, where they lived, or how they are. And there is no way to tell what their sexual preferences were, aside from augmented body, maybe clothing.

Brain scans and genettestsest will not yield results either. There are medictestsest that can proveperson'sons race. There are no medical tests for sexual preference. 

People usually treat a Black person by the skin and sometimes by other features, nose, hair, l, etc.

But no one knows if someone is gay unless they tell them or show them.

Should the day come when I choose to be no longer Black, would that make it so? Could someone stop being Black or any race? You call yourself anything you want, but would mean the health warning issued to Black people would no longer apply to you?

What I'm saying is that you change your outer appearance and call yourself anything, even with surgery, but inwardly, you would still be what GOD designed you to be. 

​

Close​

Gay is not the new Black.

And you do a disservice to all the blacks who've suffered to use what they endured to push political movements or personal desires. Like the joke from earlier... "I'm going to beat you like a slave!" It's not so funny when you look at it in context. And we see how we abuse the people by listing what they went through. While some lgbt members have endured hardship, if they want to compare war stories or horror stories, they will see a significant difference.

A boy's father went off to war and suffered injuries in battle. When he came home, he was not the same man. He was crippled physically and emotionally. One day, some boys saw the boy outside with his disabled father, and they began to laugh and mock him...

The boy, filled with anger, faced them and said stop making fun of my father! He got hurt in battle. He did it for you!"

That boy's father got hurt and lost his independence for those other boys to live free. He was willing to sacrifice for the people he loved and his country.

In the same way, my people, the Africans off the boat, built America for you. America is an industrious and prosperous nation because it was built on the back of slave labor. If my people had not come here and worked the land early from early on, would America have been as great as it is?

My great-grandfather died digging the tunnels for the Historic A-train subway line in New York. And I am the fourth generation out of slavery... Stop making light of my father's.

Stop belittling what they did and what they went through; they did it for you! To relate the suffering of Blacks to Gays is to belittle all we went through and are going through. 

​​

Why is it, at Black rallies and meetings since George Floyd died we see lgbt flags and banners, what does one have to do with the other? Who is trying to make Black synonymous with gay? Black does not equal gay; my ancestors did not go through what they went through for that! They would never have signed on!

Stop mocking my father. 

Gay people have never suffered in that way or to that level.

They suffered because of what they did so that Americans could profit. Now, it seems another group is trying to profit off them even after they die.

It's not the Black, that phrase hurts the people it hides behind and re-abuses a people who already have been aroused and trying to heal.